As it Turns Out, a Good Mailbox Size Is…

Written by Casper Manes on October 21, 2011

Last month, I posted an article titled “What’s a good mailbox size?” where I discussed many of the considerations an architect must take into account when sizing storage for a new email system. In that post, I also set up a survey where I asked readers to answer six short questions about what they think makes a good size for a mailbox, as well as what future plans they might have for system growth. As promised in last month’s post, I am sharing the results of the survey now.

While the total number of respondents was somewhat less than I hoped for, the quality of those responses from survey participants is greatly appreciated. No one skipped any of the first four questions; the last two were “if” type and should have been skipped if not applicable. Thanks to all those who took the time to share their answers. I will share each question and the responses by percentage below.

1. What email system are you running now?

Exchange 2003 (on-premise) 8.3%
Exchange 2007 (on-premise) 41.7%
Exchange 2010 (on-premise) 41.7%
Lotus Notes (any version) 8.3%
SendMail (any version) 0.0%
Outsourced/Hosted/Cloud (any version) 0.0%
Other 0.0%

The vast majority of respondents are running Exchange, with a smattering of Notes, but nothing else apparently. While the dominance of Exchange was no surprise, that not a single Groupwise or Sendmail admin responded makes me wonder whether those products are dying out, or if their admins simply are too busy to deal with surveys.

 

2. What is the standard mailbox size (in MB) for regular users?

less than 100 MB 0.0%
101 to 500 MB 41.7%
501 to 1024 MB 0.0%
1025 to 5120 MB 33.3%
5121 to 10240 MB 16.7%
10241 to 25600 MB 0.0%
larger than 25600 MB 8.3%

Almost half of those responding give standard users mailboxes less than half a gig. Those results shocked me on their own, but wait until you read question four!

 

3. What is the standard mailbox size (in MB) for special users (IT, executive, HR, or any other group that needs a larger mailbox)?

less than 100 MB 0.0%
101 to 500 MB 25.0%
501 to 1024 MB 16.7%
1025 to 5120 MB 8.3%
5121 to 10240 MB 16.7%
10241 to 25600 MB 16.7%
larger than 25600 MB 16.7%

It looks like half of the admins who responded draw no distinction between regular users and special users. How egalitarian of you. We do see an uptick in the sizes though, with the other half of you giving special users 5 GB or more of storage space.

 

4. Is your current mailbox size adequate for the majority of users?

yes 91.7%
no 8.3%

Okay, this is the answer that floored me. Over 90% of respondents feel their mailbox sizes are adequate. Considering how many provision regular users with less than half a Gigabyte, that is not at all what I would have expected. If you are one of those folks, please let us know in the comments how you do it. Do you have an aggressive deletion policy, an archiving solution, or do you just prohibit attachments? Inquiring minds want to know.

 

5. If you are considering a larger mailbox size for regular users, how big would you like that to be?

less than 100 MB 0.0%
101 to 500 MB 28.6%
501 to 1024 MB 14.3%
1025 to 5120 MB 14.3%
5121 to 10240 MB 28.6%
10241 to 25600 MB 14.3%
larger than 25600 MB 0.0%

This is another response that did not come out like I expected. No one is looking for huge mailboxes (>25 Gigabytes) and most look like they would be happy with 10 GB or less. Storage vendors may weep to see this.

 

6. If you are considering a larger mailbox size for special users, how big would you like that to be?

less than 100 MB 0.0%
101 to 500 MB 12.5%
501 to 1024 MB 0.0%
1025 to 5120 MB 37.5%
5121 to 10240 MB 12.5%
10241 to 25600 MB 37.5%
larger than 25600 MB 0.0%

Now we see an expected distinction, where special users will get much larger mailboxes. The designers of Exchange 2010 are smiling that so many of us share their vision.

 

So to summarise, the vast majority of regular users’ mailboxes are either in the 512MB range, or in the 1 to 5 GB range. In about half the cases, special users get a bump to 5 GB or larger. Most of us are happy with our mailbox sizes, but if we were going to increase them, it’s only the special users who’d really see a big change, and no one seems to want to go above 25 GB for mail.

Once again I’d like to thank those of you who participated in the survey for your time and the information you shared. I know it will be very useful to me, and I hope that other regular readers of TheEmailAdmin can also benefit from this.

Are there any other issues you’d like to see surveyed and discussed here? Any questions you’d love to see asked in such a large forum? If there are, leave a comment and if I get enough good ones, I will create another survey for the readers so we can see just how everyone else is doing it.

Subscribe to my RSS feed

6 Comments to “As it Turns Out, a Good Mailbox Size Is…”

  1. JTio Says:

    In response to #4, we have been able to maintain lower mailbox sizes because most of our users use Public Folders to house project email. We use Public Folders as an email repository for each project and then archive the PST once the project is finished. This has significantly reduced our user’s needs for keeping so much email.

  2. Corey Turner Says:

    As someone who missed the survey (sorry), I can tell you that it’s an aggressive deletion policy that helps us keep such a low mailbox size at our organization. Maybe it’s not the best way to do things (I know I’ve had to bite my tongue trying to push for upgrades in the past) but one thing’s for sure, it keeps our storage costs low.

  3. Coco_Puff Says:

    In this day and age where hard disk space usage is now very tolerable and cloud computing is on its way to mainstream use, a “good” mailbox size is approximately 25 GB for regular users and more than 50 GB for the special ones. I think this is just right and practical especially to robust organizations.

    We’re not living in the early 2000s anymore where disk space is too valuable. Even Gmail’s disk limit is expanding. I still remember when Gmail only had 2 GB. At present it’s now more than 7 GB (and growing). This just proves that mailbox size is not as “required” anymore.

    Even web host providers are also expanding their mailbox limit. Most of them have unlimited disk storage for personal use.

  4. Faith Shinko Says:

    Well, there’s a difference between “good”, “practical”, and “excellent”. For me, 5 GB is good enough. However, it’s not that practical. This is because spam and email attachments are becoming a trend now. People love to share photos, and even videos and mp3s through email – PLUS thus forwarded messages.

    In my own experience, the “excellent” mailbox size for regular users is somewhere between 10 to 20 GB. The practical size should be approx 5-10 GB.

  5. Brian Says:

    I can’t believe the respones I’m hearing, 25 GB should be the default…crazy.

    The IT folks who are allowing this have you considered the issue from the client side? Opening a mailbox with a 5 – 25 GB OST will run like garbage. Microsoft has an article specific to Exchange 2007 stating that 2 GB is optimal size, 5 – 10 OK assuming enough RAM and a fast disk, more than 10 GB expect pauses and delays in Outlook performance. Article link > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc671168(EXCHG.80).aspx

    The next issue is having enough window of time for the storage maintenance to run with mailbox stores housing users with 25+ gigabyte mailboxes. In our scenario we have 270 mailboxes at 25 GB per person we’d need about 12 terrabytes of space and a lot more than that 12 terrabytes of space for backup.

  6. Laura L. Says:

    Gosh, I am surprised how stingy we are! 41.7% of users have less than 500MB of space! It is 2011, not 1997, people. Good, though, that we didn’t get any answers in less than 100MB category because this would have really shocked me. The Public Folders policy is great but I doubt it is so widely used and this is why the average mailbox size is that small.

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy