<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email still king despite pretenders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theemailadmin.com/2009/10/email-still-king-despite-pretenders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theemailadmin.com/2009/10/email-still-king-despite-pretenders/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:46:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailadmin.com/2009/10/email-still-king-despite-pretenders/comment-page-1/#comment-12083</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailadmin.com/?p=1730#comment-12083</guid>
		<description>Excellent post!  I am self-admitted email apologist and feel it&#039;s been unfairly attacked over the years.  Yet the humorous thing is that the attack has become as predictable and regular as its inaccuracy.  Frankly, most authors miss some of the great aspects of email (namely its universality and open-ness) that make it so ubiquitous and useful.  In other words, other media may be better tailored for certain use cases, but none are so generically-applicable.

More at:
http://blog.liveoffice.com/blog/bid/10559/Groundhog-Day-Email-is-dead-again-not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!  I am self-admitted email apologist and feel it&#8217;s been unfairly attacked over the years.  Yet the humorous thing is that the attack has become as predictable and regular as its inaccuracy.  Frankly, most authors miss some of the great aspects of email (namely its universality and open-ness) that make it so ubiquitous and useful.  In other words, other media may be better tailored for certain use cases, but none are so generically-applicable.</p>
<p>More at:<br />
<a href="http://blog.liveoffice.com/blog/bid/10559/Groundhog-Day-Email-is-dead-again-not" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.liveoffice.com/blog/bid/10559/Groundhog-Day-Email-is-dead-again-not?referer=');">http://blog.liveoffice.com/blog/bid/10559/Groundhog-Day-Email-is-dead-again-not</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
