<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Semantic Email Addressing the Future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theemailadmin.com/2009/03/is-semantic-email-addressing-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theemailadmin.com/2009/03/is-semantic-email-addressing-the-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Koch</title>
		<link>http://www.theemailadmin.com/2009/03/is-semantic-email-addressing-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-33501</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Koch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theemailadmin.com/?p=601#comment-33501</guid>
		<description>Semantic technology has so many advantages that it is surprising that its use at present is so limited. Email addressing needs to get smarter and semantic technology can do it. Probably vendors are too focused on other issues and this is why they haven&#039;t implemented semantic features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semantic technology has so many advantages that it is surprising that its use at present is so limited. Email addressing needs to get smarter and semantic technology can do it. Probably vendors are too focused on other issues and this is why they haven&#8217;t implemented semantic features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

